Daily Basketball

NBA and NCAA blogging on an occasionally daily basis

Thoughts on the Draft

By Jarrad Todd

San Antonio Spurs

What do the Spurs have against promising young power forwards? First, they trade away Luis Scola, and then pass on Kansas forward Darrell Arthur in the draft. It’s not as if they are stacked at power forward. In fact, I believe it’s their weakest position, with Matt Bonner, Fabricio Oberto and Ian Mahinmi the only guarantees to return next season. A guy with a diverse skill-set like Arthur would have been perfect to develop alongside Tim Duncan. Let’s remember, Arthur had 20 points and 10 rebounds in the victory over Memphis that gave Kansas the NCAA title. Even with concerns over a kidney issue he was worth the risk. Instead, they give a valuable first round contract that is guaranteed to IUPUI guard George Hill. Not only was he absent from most mock drafts, he was not even listed in the 224 page NBA Draft Guide. At best, he will be Tony Parker’s back-up. A puzzling choice by the Spurs.

Indiana Pacers

Instead of being thrilled to grab the steal of the draft at No. 11 (Bayless), the Pacers immediately sent him packing to Portland in exchange for role players. Brandon Rush will be a solid pro but will back-up Danny Granger and Mike Dunleavy, whilst Jack will sub for T.J. Ford. Jerryd Bayless was tipped to go fourth to the Sonics because he is a potential 20ppg scorer and Allstar. It seems as though the Pacers are content with mediocrity. Either that, or Larry Bird has no idea what he is doing.

Boston Celtics

With the 30th pick the Celtics should have grabbed crafty Memphis swingman Chris Douglas-Roberts. CDR would have immediately brought extra scoring off the bench, and may have been an eventual replacement for the aging Ray Allen. Whilst I do believe that the Celtics made a good decision trading for Bill Walker in the second round, selecting CDR at No. 30 would have been a steal for the champs.

Portland Trail Blazers

You’ve got to hand it to the Blazers, they sure know how to manipulate the draft. To come away with Jerryd Bayless and Nicolas Batum when their roster is already stacked with young stars, is very impressive. GMs around the league could learn a great deal from watching Portland’s Kevin Pritchard operate on draft day (are you listening Larry Bird?).

5 Comments »

  Eric wrote @ June 28th, 2008 at 7:15 am

I agree with the Spurs comments.I mean Darrell Arthur he’s would have been perfect for San Antonio.I think they don’t have a problem with young PF’s either, they just have a problem with young talent ……Period

  Matthew Kimel wrote @ June 28th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

The Spurs era maybe coming to an end.

  Neil wrote @ June 30th, 2008 at 1:46 am

You are spot on about the Bayless/Rush trade. Portland is gonna be stacked with Bayless, Roy, Alridge, and Oden. Each one of them is a high character guy that brings a unique skill set. The Blazers will be one of the most versatile teams next year. They are going to be next year’s Hornets,

  la287 wrote @ June 30th, 2008 at 9:18 am

As consistent as the Spurs have been for the past decade, I have a hard time seeing them make enough improvements to overcome their age. The Spurs will probably remain a fixture in the playoffs, but I’m not sure they’ll win another championship without adding another young piece.

We’ll see how the Trailblazers do this year. They should be an exciting team to watch. A lot of young players, and they’ve overcome the “Jailblazers” image.

  Both Teams Played Hard wrote @ July 1st, 2008 at 9:23 pm

Unfortunately, the Pacers being “content with mediocrity” is a giant leap for mankind for us Indiana faithful. Oh bother.

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Click here for basketball training videos with Chauncey Billups, Jason Kidd, and JJ Redick.
Copyright © Daily Basketball 2008
Subscribe via RSS Feed  |  Advertise  |  Guest Blogging